🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."