🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial law change that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often spent years building local support and pushing their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.